Social Worker Burnout Studied

Social Worker Burnout StudiedSocial Worker Burnout Studied(Fall 2003)AUTHOR-ABSTRACTFor the past 30 years, inquiryers and practitioners bugger off been fretfulnessed to the highest degree the refer of fail try go done by favorable disciplineers. Although research on burnout has been a useful field of exploration, a revolutionary concern has arisen around oeuvre stresses specifically associated with earn with victims of hurt. The concept of secondhand accidental injury posts insights into the stresses of this particular kind-hearted of work. Like the burnout research, early research on vicarious damage has identified both someoneal and giving medicational cor thinks. In this article, the authors review the growing belles-lettres on the organizational components of vicarious suffering and suggest changes in organizational culture, workload, gathering support, care, egotism-c atomic number 18, rearing, and work environs that whitethorn help prevent vicario us trauma in faculty.BODY WHETHER SHAPING PUBLIC constitution or providing go to persons, families, and communities, cordial actors are fully engaged with todays social problems. This fractious work bottom develop an emotional and psychological toll on the actor (Davies, 1998 Gibson, McGrath, Reid, 1989). This stress comes non only from responding to batch in pain and crisis characteristics of the organization in kindred manner pass to the stress (Sze Ivker, 1986). This occupational stress has been examined primarily in terms of burnout (Maslach, 1993), exclusively recent research in the field of trauma has identified stresses unique to that work. These stresses score been conceptualized as vicarious trauma (McCann Pearlman, 1990b Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995a, 1995b). To date, to the highest degree research has focused on the individual characteristics thought to contri juste to vicarious trauma. There has been little focus on the organizational structures that may contribute. In this article, we draw on the research on organizational correlates of burnout as a background for examining the research on vicarious trauma and then outline various organizational strategies suggested by practitioners works with trauma survivors to prevent vicarious trauma. This pr separatelying is informed by a qualitative study of counselors work with victims of domestic violence (Bell, 1998, 1999) that suggested the importance of the work environment, among other issues, in the turn outment of vicarious trauma. Quotations by counselors from that study will be used to expatiate the give-and-take.Organizational Correlates of BurnoutMaslach (1993) describe burnout as having three dimensions (a) emotional exhaustion (b) de individual(prenominal)ization, defined as a electro contradict attitude towards invitees, a personal detachment, or loss of i slews and (c) reduced personal accomplishment and commitment to the profession. Burnout has been conceptualized a s a process rather than a condition or state, and some have theorized that it progresses sequentially finished each of these dimensions (Maslach, 1993). Maslach and others have examined the individual, interpersonal, and organizational characteristics that contribute to burnout. Of particular interest to this discussion is the finding that organizations throne all promote job satisfaction or contribute to burnout (Soderfeldt, Soderfeldt, Warg, 1995). Unsupportive administration, lack of professed(prenominal) challenge, low salaries, and difficulties encountered in providing node services are predictive of higher burnout rates (Arches, 1991 Beck, 1987 Himle, Jayaratne, Thyness, 1986). Individual lag members suffer, and the resulting loss of haved staff pot diminish the quality of client services (Arches, 1991). This research has helped identify organizational supports that could be effective in buffering or mediating burnout and point to workplace characteristics that may likewise prevent vicarious trauma. collateral TraumaRecently, the occupational stress of social proles workings with trauma survivors has begun to receive attention (Cunningham, 1999 Dalton, 2001 Regehr Cadell, 1999). Some authors are beginning to suggest that trauma supposition has important utility in understanding the burnout subsist of social workers working in child protection and with HIV-infected populations (Horwitz, 1998 Wade, Beckerman, Stein, 1996). Many theorists have speculated that the emotional impact of this type of traumatic veridical is contagious and can be transmitted through the process of empathy (Figley, 1995 Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995a Stamm, 1995), as in this use from an experienced social worker talking almost counseling women in a family service chestSome times after a session, I will be traumatized.I will obtain over whelmed, and I can remember a particular situation with a innerly abused person where II just didnt want to hear any overmu ch of her stories about what actually happened.She seemed to want to hold to tell me those over and over and I remember just depression almost contaminated,like,you dwell,like I was abused. You know? And so I set limits withher a fter some super vision about that but bring in her in a different way.It hink it has an impact. Im just not sure of what(a squoted in Bell,1998) In the past 10 years, the emotional impact of working with trauma survivors has been examined under several constructs compassion fatigue (Figley, 1995), secondary traumatic stress (Figley, 1993 Stamm, 1995), and vicarious trauma (McCann Pearlman, 1990b Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995a, 1995b). These constructs have been compared and debated (Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995a Stamm, 1995), and a full discussion of them is outside the scope of this article. The legal age of the empirical studies in this area have used the vicarious trauma construct. For this reason, the term vicarious trauma will oecumenically be used thr oughout this article unless another term has been used specifically in the research cited.vicarious trauma has been defined as the transformation that occurs in the inner experience of the therapist or worker that comes about as a result of empathic engagement with clients trauma substantial (Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995a, p. 31). Vicarious trauma can result in physiological symptoms that resemble posttraumatic stress reactions, which may manifest themselves either in the form of invasive symptoms, such(prenominal)(prenominal) as flashbacks, night-mares, and obsessive thoughts, or in the form of constraining symptoms, such as numbing and disassociation (Beaton Murphy, 1995). It may also result in pickions to important beliefs, called cognitive schemas, that individuals hold about themselves, other people, and the ground (McCann Pearlman, 1990b Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995a, 1995b), as in the following example from a unexampled worker in a battered womens shelterI think you see the worst of people, working herethe worst of what people do to each other. And I think when you do nt have proper option stop rocess that,to work through it, to underst and it or put it in some kind of context, it just leaves you feeling a little baffle dabout whats going on out in that respect, and the way things work in the world and your role in all of that.(asquotedin Bell,1999,p.175) Although some of the numbing symptoms of vicarious trauma bear some comparison to burnout and may in fact result in burnout over time, research on therapists has also begun to prime vicarious trauma as a distinct concept from burnout (Figley, 1995 Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995a). Unlike the construct of burnout, the construct of vicarious trauma was developed from and is clinically grounded in trauma theory, specifically constructivist self-development theory (McCann Pearlman, 1990b). In several studies, burnout and general stress levels were not related to exposure to traumatized clients, where as measures of trauma exposure and vicarious trauma were related (Kassam-Adams, 1995 Schauben Frazier, 1995). Thus, burnout whole does not appear to capture the cause of trauma as an occupational stressor. Although vicarious trauma may present with elements of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment, it also has effects that are unique and specific to trauma work.Many professionals risk vicarious trauma through their contact with traumatized people or material that contains intense images of trauma. Studies have indicated that approximately 38% of social workers experience moderate to high levels of secondary traumatic stress (Cornille Meyers, 1999 Dalton, 2001). In addition, emergency workers (Leseca, 1996 McCammon, Durham, Allison, Williamson, 1988 Wagner, Heinrichs, Ehlert, 1998), nurses (Joinson, 1992), police officers (Follette, Polusny, Milbeck, 1994), sexual misdemeanour counselors (Johnson Hunter, 1997 Regehr Cadell, 1999 Schau ben Frazier, 1995), child protective service workers (Cornille Meyers, 1999), and trauma therapists (Chrestman, 1995 Follette et al., 1994 Kassam-Adams, 1995 Pearlman macintosh Ian,1995) have all been documented as developing symptomology quite similar to acute and posttraumatic stress reactions as a result of their second-hand exposure to traumatic material.Recent studies of trauma therapists have begun to explore some of the factors come to in the development of vicarious trauma. Therapist exposure to traumatic client material has been found to be an important predictor for symptoms of traumatic stress and, in some cases, of disrupted beliefs about self and others. In a survey of 148 counselors, Schauben and Frazier (1995) found that those who worked with a higher percentage of sexual violence survivors account more symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and greater disruptions in their beliefs about themselves and others than did counselors seeing fewer survivors. The re searchers tied these symptoms of trauma counselors to a number of factors. Most commonly, counselors said that hearing the trauma story and experiencing the pain of survivors was emotionally draining. Second, many counselors snarl that the counseling process was more difficult when working with trauma survivors, who tended to have more problems trusting and working in a therapeutic kind than clients who were not traumatized. Finally, some counselors found the work more difficult because of the institutional barriers within the legal, and psychic health systems that their clients were forced to navigate. Similar findings emerged when researchers compared the stress level of sexual assault counselors with that of counselors who worked with a more general client population (Johnson Hunter, 1997). Not only did sexual assault counselors verbalise greater evidence of stress, but their work stress also contributed to personal relationship difficulties at home.The impact of the therapi sts own explanation of abuse on current report of vicarious trauma are unclear. Pearlman and MacIan (1995) reported significantly more vicarious trauma symptoms in 60% of the therapists they surveyed who reported a personal history of trauma. However, Schauben and Frazier (1995) found that counselors with a history of victimization were not more distressed by working with survivors than were counselors without such a history. Pearlman and Mac Ian found that therapists without a trauma history were more likely to report intrusive imagery than those with a history. Follette et al. (1994) found that mental health professionals with a significant history of childhood bodily or sexual abuse did not experience significantly more negative responses to child sexual abuse survivor clients than those without such a history. They also reported significantly more positive header strategies. However, the comparison root of rightfulness enforcement personnel with childhood abuse histories w ho also worked with sexual abuse survivors showed significantly more distress than the mental health professionals. The researchers hypothesized that the use of personal therapy by 59.1% of the mental health professionals versus 15.6% of the law enforcement professionals may have accounted for the difference.Increased time spent with traumatized clients seems to increase the risk of stress reactions in mental health professionals (Chrestman, 1995 Pearlman Mac Ian, 1995). Furthermore, spending time in other work activities decreases the risk. Having a more versatile caseload with a greater signifier of client problems and participating in research, upbringing, and outreach also appear to mediate the effects of traumatic exposure.Age and experience are inversely correlated with the development of vicarious trauma. Younger and less experienced counselors exhibit the highest levels of distress (Arvay Uhlemann, 1996 Pearlman Mac Ian, 1995). They may have had less opportunity to int egrate traumatic stories and experiences into their belief systems, as well as to develop effective coping strategies for dealing with the effects of vicarious trauma than have older and more experienced therapists (Neumann Gamble, 1995). Such was the case of this experienced counselor who worked with battered women in the court systemIt hink for somebody who doesnt do this type of work it would be extreme lystressful, but after twelve years, Ive justIve handled so many cases and dealt with so many people, I know my limitation back the courts limitations and I just dont get as worked up about each case as I used to.(as quoted in Bell, 1999,p.117) vicarious trauma can be run acrossed a type of occupational hap in settings where there are high levels of traumatized clients. As a result, organizations providing services to trauma victims have a practical and ethical responsibility to address this risk.Implications for business office Administrative ResponseThe primary focus of dis cussion about the bar of vicarious trauma has been on the individual (for a good summary, see Yassen, 1995). However, as with burnout, the organizational context of trauma work has been discussed as a factor in the development of secondary trauma. Several authors have written about their own experiences in agencies that serve traumatized individuals. They have suggested both prevention and intervention strategies in the areas of organizational culture, workload, work environment, education, group support, inspection, and resources for self-care. Each of these will be discussed in bout below.Organizational CultureThe values and culture of an organization set the expectations about the work. When the work includes contact with trauma, they also set the expectations about how workers will experience trauma and deal with it, both professionally and personally. Of primary concern is that organizations that serve trauma survivors, whether rape crisis centers, shelters for battered wome n, or programs that work with veterans, accognition the impact of trauma on the individual worker and the organization. As Rosenbloom, Pratt, and Pearlman (1995) wrote of their work at the Traumatic Stress Institute, We work unneurotic to develop an atmosphere in which it is considered inevitable to be affected by the work (p. 77). It is not uncommon for feelings and reactions generated by trauma to leave the social worker feeling ineffective, unskilled, and even powerless. An organizational culture that normalizes the effect of working with trauma survivors can provide a supportive environment for social workers to address those effects in their own work and lives. It also gives permission for social workers to take care of themselves. Yassen (1995) provided an example of a potentially harmful norm that can frustrate workers attempts at self-care In some settings, it may be off-key that if employees do not work overtime, they are not committed to their work, or that clinicians who do not take vacations are more committed to their work than are others (p. 201). A supportive organization is one that not only allows for vacations, but also creates opportunities for social workers to vary their caseload and work activities, take time off for illness, introduce in continuing education, and make time for other self-care activities. Small agencies cogency signal their commitment to staff by making staff self-care a part of the mission statement, understanding that ultimately it does affect client care. Administrators capability also monitor staff vacation time and encourage staff with too much accrued time to take time off. Self-care issues could be addressed in staff meetings, and opportunities for continuing education could be circulated to staff. In social work agencies, which typically operate with inadequate resources and relentless service demands, such commitments, regardless of how small, are not inconsequential.WorkloadResearch has shown that having a m ore diverse caseload is associated with decreased vicarious trauma (Chrestman, 1995). Such diversity can help the social worker keep the traumatic material in perspective and prevent the formation of a traumatic worldview (Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995a). Agencies could develop intake procedures that attempt to imbue clients among staff in a way that pays attention to the risk of vicarious trauma certain clients efficiency present to workers. When possible, trauma cases should be distributed among a number of social workers who possess the necessary skills (Dutton Rubinstein, 1995 Regehr Cadell, 1999 Wade et al., 1996). In addition, social workers whose primary job is to provide direct services to traumatized people may benefit from opportunities to insert in social change activities (Regehr Cadell, 1999). Agencies that do not already provide such services might consider providing community education and outreach or working to influence policy. Such activities can provide a sense of hope and empowerment that can be energizing and can neutralize some of the negative effects of trauma work. Organizations can also maintain an attitude of respect (Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995b, p. 170) for both clients and workers by acknowledging that work with trauma survivors often involves multiple, long-term services. Organizations that are proactive in developing or linking clients with adjunct servicessuch as self-help groups, experienced medical professionals for medication, in- and out-patient hospitalization, and resources for paying for these serviceswill support not only clients, but also decrease the workload of their staff (Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995b). Developing collaborations between agencies that work with traumatized clients can provide material support and prevent a sense of isolation and frustration at having to go it alone.Work EnvironmentA safe, comfortable, and private work environment is crucial for those social workers in settings that may expose them to vi olence (Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995b Yassen, 1995). Some work sites, such as shelters or agencies located in high-crime neighborhoods, are so dangerous that workers may actually experience primary trauma, rather than vicarious trauma. In a sample of 210 licensed social workers, Dalton (2001) found that 57.6% had been endanger by a client or member of a clients family, and 16.6% had been physically or sexually assaulted by a client or member of the clients family. Being threatened by a client or a member of a clients family was strongly correlated with compassion fatigue. Although it is more of a challenge in certain settings, protecting workers safety should be the primary concern of agency administration. Paying for security systems or security guards may be a necessary cost of doing business for some agencies that provide services to traumatized individuals. Failing that, agencies may consider developing a buddy system for coworkers so that if one worker is threatened by a client, a nother can summon the police.In addition to attention to basic safety, Pearlman and Saakvitne (1995b) have suggested that workers need to have personally meaningful items in their workplace. These can include pictures of their children or of places they have visited, scenes of nature or quotes that help them remember who they are and why they do this work. One hotline worker described her use of such an itemWhen itsare alintense call, I kind of hunch over the phone and kind of like focus here on mycomputer screenand I some times try to consciously tell my self to sit back and look at one of my pictures that I have up to remind me of happier times.(asquotedin Bell,1998)Agency administrators can encourage staff to make these small investments in their work environment. By placing inspiring posters or pictures of scenic environments (rather than agency rules and regulations) in the waiting rooms, staff meeting rooms, and break rooms, the organization can framework the importance of the personal in the professional. In addition, workers also need places for rest at the job site, such as a break room that is separate from clients (Yassen, 1995). With a space such as this, the organization could address the self-care needs of staff by providing a coffee maker, soft music, and comfortable furniture.EducationTrauma-specific education also diminishes the potential of vicarious trauma. Information can help individuals to name their experience and provide a framework for understanding and responding to it. Training settings, such as schools of social work, have a responsibility to provide this schooling to field interns entering placements where they will encounter trauma (Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995b). Dalton (2001) found that social workers with masters degrees had pull down levels of secondary traumatic stress compared with those with baccalaureate degrees. This difference suggests that the type of clinical training available in masters programs, such as informatio n about client empowerment, self-care, and recognizing destructive behaviors, may be a missing but important part of training social workers in baccalaureate programs to prevent secondary stress and vicarious trauma.Efforts to educate staff about vicarious trauma can begin in the job interview (Urquiza, Wyatt, Goodlin-Jones, 1997). Agencies have a duty to warn applicants of the potential risks of trauma work and to survey new workers resilience (Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995b). New employees can be educated about the risks and effects associated with trauma, as new and inexperienced workers are likely to experience the most impact (Chrestman, 1995 Neumann Gamble, 1995). Ongoing education about trauma theory and the effects of vicarious trauma can be included in staff training (Regehr Cadell, 1999 Urquiza et al., 1997) and discussed on an ongoing basis as part of staff meetings. Agencies can take vantage of the flourishing number of workshops on vicarious trauma at professional confe rences in social work and other disciplines by sending a staff member for training and petition that worker to dispense what he or she has learned with the rest of the staff. This information provides a useful context and helps social workers to feel more competent and have more realistic expectations about what they can accomplish in their professional role. Preparation for a stressful event, when possible, protects individuals from the effect of stress (Chemtob et al., 1990).Learning new ways to address clients trauma may also help prevent vicarious trauma. Theories, such as constructivist self-development theory (McCann Pearlman, 1990a) on which the theory of vicarious trauma is based, maintain a dual focus between past traumas and the clients current strengths and resources. running(a) from a theoretical framework that acknowledges and enhances client strengths and focuses on solutions in the present can feel empowering for client and worker and reduce the risk of vicarious trauma.Group SupportBoth the burnout literature and the writings about vicarious trauma emphasize the importance of social support within the organization (Catherall, 1995 Munroe et al., 1995 Rosenbloom et al., 1995). Staff opportunities to debrief informally and process traumatic material with executive programs and companions are helpful (Horwitz, 1998 Regehr Cadell, 1999 Urquiza et al., 1997). Critical incident stress question (Mitchell, 1983, as cited in Wollman, 1993) is a more formalized method for processing specific traumatic events but may be less helpful in managing repetitive or chronic traumatic material (Horwitz, 1998). Support can also take the form of coworkers help with paperwork or emergency backup. Time for social interaction between coworkers, such as celebrating birthdays or other events as well as unionized team-building activities and staff retreats, can increase workers feeling of group cohesion and mutual support.Peer support groups may help because peer s can often clarify colleagues insights, listen for and correct cognitive distortions, offer perspective/reframing, and relate to the emotional state of the social worker (Catherall, 1995). Group support can take a variety of forms, such as consultation, treatment teams, case conferences, or clinical seminars, and can be either peer led or professionally led. For example, shelter workers interviewed by Bell (1999) started a reading group and together read and discussed Pearlman and Saakvitnes (1995a) book, Trauma and the Therapist Countertransference and Vicarious Traumatization in Psychotherapy With Incest Survivors. The group met after work on a regular basis. Group members learned about vicarious trauma and ways to deal with it in their own work and lives. The group cost the agency nothing, did not interfere with work, and provided an opportunity for workers to give each other much-needed support. Regardless of the form group support takes, Munroe et al. (1995) warned that it sho uld be considered an adjunct to, not a interpose for, self-care or clinical supervision.There are some potential pitfalls of group support. One is the tendency toward groupthink and unison (Munroe et al., 1995). Another is that members hearing about a coworkers distress may use distancing and victim-blaming as a refutal mechanism. Peer groups and treatment teams also offer the opportunity for traumatic reenactments, such as splitting the group members into the roles of exploiter and exploited, that are so common in working with trauma survivors (Munroe et al., 1995). When groups are held within agencies, there is also the potential problem generated by conflicting roles in the group, such as a supervisor who is both supporter and evaluator or a coworker/supervisor who is also a friend. Finally, group members may be more rather than less traumatized by the necessity of hearing each others worst mutual exclusiveness stories. Guzzino and Taxis (1995) have suggested a number of ways for members of such groups to talk about their experiences without further traumatizing group members through the use of psychodrama and art therapy. To further minimize the potential for problems in support groups, Catherall (1995) has suggested that group members discuss such a possibility before it happens and normalize the experience of vicarious trauma and its impact on the individual and the group.SupervisionEffective supervision is an essential component of the prevention and healing of vicarious trauma. Responsible supervision creates a relationship in which the social worker feels safe in expressing fears, concerns, and inadequacies (Welfel, 1998). Organizations with a weekly group supervision format establish a venue in which traumatic material and the subsequent personal effect may be processed and normalized as part of the work of the organization. As one hotline worker said of the value of supervisory support in response to a stressful call Its kind of like you have th is big sack of rocks and e actually time you kind of tell someone about it you can, you know, give them a couple of your rocks and your sack gets lighter (as quoted in Bell, 1998).In addition to providing emotional support, supervisors can also teach staff about vicarious trauma in a way that is supportive, respectful, and bleak to its effects (Pearlman Saakvitne, 1995b Regehr Cadell, 1999 Rosenbloom et al., 1995 Urquiza et al., 1997). If at all possible, supervision and evaluation should be separate functions in an organization because a concern about evaluation might make a worker reluctant to bring up issues in his or her work with clients that might be signals of vicarious trauma. Dalton (2001) found that 9% of the variance in her study of social workers and secondary traumatic stress was related to supervision. Her results indicated that the number of times a worker received nonevaluative supervision and the number of hours of nonevaluative supervision were positively relate d to low levels of secondary traumatic stress. In situations where supervisors cannot separate the supervisory and evaluative functions, agency administrators might consider contracting with an outside consultant for trauma-specific supervision on either an individual or group basis. The cost of such preventive consultation might be well worth the cost savings that would result from decreased employee turnover or ineffectiveness as a result of vicarious trauma.Resources for Self-CareAgencies can make counseling resources available for all staff that interact with traumatic material (Regehr Cadell, 1999 Wade et al., 1996). If there are many employees encountering the same type of trauma in the agency or within the larger community, agencies may consider the feasibility of forming a peer support group, as discussed earlier. Workers also need health insurance that provides mental health coverage (Rosenbloom et al., 1995). followers is a quote from one young shelter worker who was see ing a therapist to deal with some of the challenges of her workIts nice to be able to talk to an other professional person, It hink, who underst and salot of the crazy things that can happen working in as helter. It hink when you try to talk with your friends about it or family, they are fright at some of the stories that you comeup with, so it help stoget feed back from an other professional who says, Oh,I know what youretalking about. Ive been there, and yes, that is very horrible.And mainly just to vent, just to be able to speak about it. To get it out, so it doesnt disrupt my life in other waysin my sleep patterns or things like that.(asquotedin Bell,1998) Wade et al. (1996) also recommended that in addition to providing resources for therapy, organizations should provide opportunities for structured stress management and physical activities. Organizations with limited resources might consider exchanging training on areas of expertise with other agencies that have experts in st ress management. Again, sending one staff member to a conference or workshop to learn stress management techniques and then asking that person to present what he or she learned to coworkers is a cost-effective way to circulate this information throughout an organization. Organizing something as simple as a walking or meditation group during the lunch hour or after work might also contribute to staff wellness at no cost.In summary, the physical and cultural environment of work may prevent or predispose social workers to vicarious trauma. Additional research is needed to understand how and to what degree social workers may be affected by the trauma they come into contact with in the workplace and which workplace variables are most salient. Furthermore, how vicarious trauma impacts the social workers relationship with clients is another fruitful area for study. Research that helps to clarify the relationship between vicarious trauma and burnout would also be useful in providing a clea rer theoretical framework from which to make agency decisions.ConclusionWorking with clients who have experienced traumatic events challenges many of the beliefs held in the prevalent culture about justice and human cruelty. Being personally exposed to these realities can take a toll on social workers emotional resources and may effect their perceptions and worldviews in fundamental ways. Personal knowledge of oppre